Could some kind of update and downgrade happen for Xscreensaver during the 20.3 to 21.0 Mint update? Oddly, I found a "Gibson" screensaver that I had never seen before. Gcc: 11.3.0 alt: 11/9 Shell: Bash v: 5.1.16 running-in: gnome-terminalĮdit: I just looked in the program and saw flux, flocks, euphoria and others in xscreensaver were also among those missing. Used: 1.91 GiB (24.9%) Init: systemd v: 249 runlevel: 5 Compilers: Processes: 221 Uptime: 24m wakeups: 0 Memory: 7.68 GiB No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.listĪctive apt repos in: /etc/apt//additional-repositories.listĪctive apt repos in: /etc/apt//official-package-repositories.listġ: deb vanessa main upstream import backportĢ: deb jammy main restricted universe multiverseģ: deb jammy-updates main restricted universe multiverseĤ: deb jammy-backports main restricted universe multiverseĥ: deb jammy-security main restricted universe multiverse System Temperatures: cpu: 29.8 C mobo: 27.8 C ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 7.63 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: -2 Speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: HDD rpm: 7200 serial: rev: CC45 scheme: GPT Report: hciconfig ID: hci0 rfk-id: 1 state: downīt-service: enabled,running rfk-block: hardware: no software: yes IF: enp2s0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: ĭevice-2: Qualcomm Atheros QCA9565 / AR9565 Wireless Network Adapter Vendor: Dell driver: r8169 v: kernel pcie: speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 Sound Server-3: PipeWire v: 0.3.48 running: yesĭevice-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Sound Server-2: PulseAudio v: 15.99.1 running: yes Sound Server-1: ALSA v: k5.15.0-52-generic running: yes Vendor: Dell driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 00:03.0ĭevice-2: Intel 8 Series/C220 Series High Definition Audio vendor: Dellĭriver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 00:1b.0 chip-ID: 8086:8c20 V: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.5 compat-v: 3.1 direct render: Yesĭevice-1: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor HD Audio OpenGL: renderer: Mesa Intel HD Graphics 4600 (HSW GT2) Monitor-1: HDMI-1 mapped: HDMI-A-1 model: LG (GoldStar) IPS FULLHD Unloaded: fbdev,vesa gpu: i915 display-ID: :0 screens: 1 Speed (MHz): avg: 798 min/max: 800/3400 cores: 1: 798 2: 798 3: 798įlags: avx avx2 ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmxĭevice-1: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Smt: arch: Haswell rev: 3 cache: L1: 256 KiB L2: 1024 KiB Info: quad core model: Intel Core i5-4460S bits: 64 type: MCP Mobo: Dell model: 02YRK5 v: A02 serial: UEFI: Dell Type: Desktop System: Dell product: Inspiron 3647 v: N/A I worked for a company that did the same - they were #1 and got comfy/lax and were bought up by another bigger company that retired the majority of their software portfolio.Kernel: 5.15.0-52-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 11.2.0ĭesktop: Cinnamon 5.4.12 tk: GTK 3.24.33 wm: Mutter vt: 7ĭm: LightDM 1.30.0 Distro: Linux Mint 21 Vanessa base: Ubuntu 22.04 jammy Did it TRY to partner with MS? Nothing I've read indicates that. MS wouldn't have run into as many issues if it hadn't made IE in such a way that it couldn't be uninstalled.īut I think Netscape played into it's own demise in hubris with 90% share of the market. But I don't recall these other companies crying foul when MS included software that did the same. MS included other things that affected other companies - dial up networking, networking and a clunky e-mail program. He's upset that Netscape went under and blames MS for Netscape's demise (and he isn't wrong). I don't agree with it as Apple is just as bad if not worse than MS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |